From: | Ilya Kosmodemiansky <ilya(dot)kosmodemiansky(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |
Date: | 2014-03-25 15:37:41 |
Message-ID: | CAG95seVsPN3keG7TmvCj-sStjy6fHvrPXbcLnK4XqqdWBVNFrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Magnus,
That is correct, but I'am afraid that such all-in-one functionality
also hides from one how backup really works. Probably such sort of
knowledge is so essential for a DBA, that it is better to learn both
methods, at least to be able to choose correctly? But maybe it is a
rhetorical question.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I would say that's the one thing that rsync is *not*. pg_basebackup takes
> care of a lot of things under the hood. rsync is a lot more complicated, in
> particular in failure scenarios, since you have to manually deal with
> pg_start/stop_backup().
>
> There are definitely reasons you'd prefer rsync over pg_basebackup, but I
> don't believe simplicity is one of them.
>
> //Magnus
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ilya Kosmodemiansky
> <ilya(dot)kosmodemiansky(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Joshua,
>>
>> that is really good point: an alternative is to use pg_basebackup
>> through ssh tunnel with compression, but rsync is much simpler.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 03/25/2014 05:05 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:39 AM, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hai,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Can anyone tell me the difference and performance between pgdump and
>> >>>> pg_basebackup if I want to backup a large database.
>> >>>>
>> >
>> > Honestly,
>> >
>> > Neither is particularly good at backing up large databases. I would look
>> > into PITR with rsync.
>> >
>> > JD
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
>> > PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
>> > High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
>> > Political Correctness is for cowards.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
>> > (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> > To make changes to your subscription:
>> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ilya Kosmodemiansky,
>>
>> PostgreSQL-Consulting.com
>> tel. +14084142500
>> cell. +4915144336040
>> ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>
>
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
Ilya Kosmodemiansky,
PostgreSQL-Consulting.com
tel. +14084142500
cell. +4915144336040
ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-03-25 15:40:02 | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Ilya Kosmodemiansky | 2014-03-25 15:29:11 | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |