Re: PATCH: Improvement in the debugger support for EnterpriseDB <= 9.2

From: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Improvement in the debugger support for EnterpriseDB <= 9.2
Date: 2013-10-23 16:52:07
Message-ID: CAG7mmozMKPL_1VPToDhBLG4xwT7G-5wfYB+SNpTmqVpo6gnPhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Ashesh Vashi
> <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > While testing the debugger at EnterpriseDB with PPAS/PostgreSQL, we found
> > some issues as below:
> > 1. Function/Procedure execution completed with an error - "no target for
> > SPL-style OUT parameter" with (PPAS <= 9.3).
> > Resolution:
> > Call the functions/procedure with the value explicitly (instead of using
> the
> > PQexecParams - libpq API and also, edb-spl language needs to be called
> from
> > an anonymous block) and fetch the result properly for PPAS <= 9.2.
> >
> > 2. Variadic function with the OUT parameter is not debuggable on
> > PostgreSQL/PPAS.
> > Resolution:
> > Fix the IN/INOUT parameters numbering properly, before creating the
> function
> > properly.
> >
> > 3. On execution completion an edb-spl function is not showing return
> value
> > with PPAS
> > Resolution:
> > As we can not return a result from the anonymous block, we needs to
> print it
> > from the anonymous block. Hence - those results will be printed in the
> > messages window instead of result window for them.
> >
> > 4. Showing the current execution marker at wrong location (offset to 1)
> for
> > PPAS <= 9.0
> > Resolution:
> > Find out the execution marker position based on the offset based on each
> > server version.
> >
> > Attached is the patch, which takes care of all of above issues.
> >
> > Please review it.
> > If nobody will have the objection, I will check-in the patch in
> > REL-1_18_PATCHES and main branches.
>
> I've eyeballed it and don't see anything objectionable.

:-)

> As you wrote
> the debugger though, you're in a far better position to say if it's
> done the right way though :-)
>
:-)

>
> Can you get one of the EDB team to test it?
>
Sure - I will ask some one from the team to test it and ask his opinion.

>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

--
--

Thanks & Regards,

Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>

*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neel Patel 2013-10-24 05:13:11 Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3
Previous Message Dave Page 2013-10-23 15:23:49 Re: PATCH: Improvement in the debugger support for EnterpriseDB <= 9.2