Re: Patch for setting preferences with user id

From: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "khushboo(dot)vashi" <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Usman Muzaffar <usman(dot)muzaffar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for setting preferences with user id
Date: 2018-10-08 12:26:14
Message-ID: CAG7mmoxitiAt3zFHfBRbNk=GsFCSW_WxjE9GOvv=4DdVqkH03w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 1:14 PM Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:43 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 1:08 PM Ashesh Vashi <
>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:36 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 1:00 PM Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:25 PM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:18 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM Usman Muzaffar <
>>>>>>>> usman(dot)muzaffar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please find here attached patch for following
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "modified the function test_utils/set_preference to accommodate
>>>>>>>>> user_id."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It will help setting preferences in case user_id is other than
>>>>>>>>> 1(depending on the user which has been logged in).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How would that ever happen? When running the tests, we initialise a
>>>>>>>> new settings database, so we're guaranteed that the user ID will be 1. If
>>>>>>>> it isn't, something is wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is true for pgAdmin but not for PEM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently - feature tests are running as the desktop (runtime) mode.
>>>>>> Tomorrow - if we want to enable the feature tests for the server
>>>>>> mode, then - this approach could be useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The tests can run in either mode.
>>>>>
>>>> No - currently it is running in the runtime mode only. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> We have some tests that *only* run in server mode, such as the password
>>> change/recovery tests.
>>>
>> Not the feature tests (only very few API test cases are for the server
>> mode).
>>
>
> Most of the test cases will run in server mode (though, yes the feature
> tests are excluded) - in fact we run 378 Python API tests in that mode
> against PG10; more with EPAS. However, my point stands; we don't need this
> patch in pgAdmin to run the tests in server mode. If PEM needs it, then it
> can go in PEM. We do not add code to pgAdmin unless it benefits pgAdmin.
>
I am not saying whether this is really required for pgAdmin, or not.
I am only advocating in what situation it may required.

-- Thanks, Ashesh

>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2018-10-08 12:49:32 [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To fix minor CSS issue
Previous Message Aditya Toshniwal 2018-10-08 12:25:32 Re: [pgAdmin4][RM3562] Migrate Bootstrap 3 to Bootstrap 4