Re: Bug in the graphical explain

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 08:58 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Works nicely - not entirely sure I understand how, but it does the
> job!!
> > >>
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > The position of the shapes were calculated based on the root-shape.
> > > As we do have multiple plans in a single explain query, the position of
> > > the shapes of the start from the same position (as the root-shape).
> > > I have created an empty root-shape, which holds all the start level
> > > shapes, and helps to determine and differentiate the position of those
> > > shapes.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, OK - thanks for the explanation.
> >
>
> And a really clever trick. I'm impressed. Thanks, Ashesh.
>
Thanks

>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> http://www.dalibo.com
>
>

--
--

Thanks & Regards,

Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>

*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>