2012/4/19 Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
> As a side point, I would recommend against doing this. Once you've
> "used" a rowid, it's not worth reusing it. You'll save yourself some
> headaches down the track if you simply ignore those odd gaps (ditto
> the gaps that result from rolled-back transactions) and just DELETE
> the rows you're throwing out without bothering to setval the sequence
> back.
>
Yes, for sure, however, i did this kind of workaround, because one time
I've seen a rowid of 8, after an insertion even if the max(rowid) was of 42.
--
Yvon