Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?

From: Rajni Baliyan <saan654(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: rajan <vgmonnet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?
Date: 2019-01-03 10:27:51
Message-ID: CAG5RORN99uPKQM1jo+B383scQ9xPcBrv-3Y_dSGAjF2iQm7RGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

It depends what is the requirement.
If you just need to monitor whether Postgres is up and running then
monitoring postmaster will be sufficient but if you also want to monitor
other processes like autovacuum, wal sender etc then include corresponding
processes as well.

Regards
Rajni

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 7:43 pm rajan <vgmonnet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It is a custom script which we have developed for *monitoring the
> processes(only)*. That is why I am asking if adding the postmaster alone
> would suffice, or I should add all the background process names?
>
> PS: These process checks are just to make sure that postgres is running.
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Thanks,
> Rajan.
> --
> Sent from:
> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html
>
> --
Thanks
Regards,
Rajni
0410472086

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rajan 2019-01-03 10:51:02 Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?
Previous Message rajan 2019-01-03 08:43:26 Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?