Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?

From: Nicolas Grilly <nicolas(at)gardentechno(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?
Date: 2019-02-28 13:27:27
Message-ID: CAG3yVS4Z5xvJmHOGAX7pmQpt+up0EEH2rOMBJkTGQF1fYf_o9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:12 PM Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Where I did this on the TB scale, we had some sort of ranking but it was
> not based on ts_rank.
>
> On the PB scale systems I work on now, it is distributed, and we don't
> order in PostgreSQL (or anywhere else, though if someone wants to write to
> disk and sort, they can do this I guess)
>

Thanks!

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Moellering 2019-02-28 13:59:43 Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2019-02-28 13:12:38 Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?