From: | Glenn Zhu <gzhu(at)medallia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns |
Date: | 2015-10-16 14:11:17 |
Message-ID: | CAG3jo=gWOY5E9HcF4AhqY_AoswyFRXU4Lh6x9f4ueBh5jX7YJg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
We can't test a non-concurrent index build in production - but your word is
just as good.
We only see this on some of production databases. We did not see it in QA
testing. But we will try to get a test case in QA.
Is this categorized as a bug specific to GIN indexes or a PostgreSQL bug in
general?
-glenn
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Glenn Zhu <gzhu(at)medallia(dot)com> writes:
> > Currently, after hitting the error, the indexes were still created but
> > marked with status of "invalid"
>
> That's just what CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY would do with any error.
> (It might be worth checking whether a non-CONCURRENTLY build hits the
> same error, though I'm betting it will.)
>
> > If it's a bug, what information would be needed to trigger a bug fix?
>
> A reproducible test case would move things along quite a bit; without that
> we're just guessing.
>
> > Is there a formal channel?
>
> Well, you could move the thread to pgsql-bugs but you might as well
> keep it where it is.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Glenn Zhu
SaaS Operations | ❖ Medallia, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-16 14:16:39 | Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-16 14:02:50 | Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns |