| From: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitioned tables vs GRANT |
| Date: | 2017-04-08 00:02:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAG1_KcBX2Lmr8w4t8ihNdEjXSYdCwR2VqCR5Gebr=ZUdqQj8+A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Apparently INSERT and SELECT on the parent partitioned table skip normal
> > acl checks on the partitions. Is that intended behavior?
>
> Yes, this matches normal inheritance behavior.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
Should that really be normal partitioning behavior though? Pretty sure
people would expect child tables to have consistent permissions in a
partition set and I'd think setting them on the parent should be what they
expect the children to have.
Keith
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-08 00:18:35 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve 64bit atomics support. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-04-07 23:42:17 | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |