| From: | Mike Dillon <mike(at)embody(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Missing userland binaries for PostGIS 2.1 |
| Date: | 2016-01-24 16:22:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAG077fAyaOdrpqg46ah_8N6MhUR-pLP3b85aePgKwbO70FKuRw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Hi all-
It looks like the apt.postgresql.org repo was recently updated to have
PostGIS 2.2 packages. I build a relatively popular Docker image for
PostGIS, so this was great to see since it's something users have been
asking to have for some time (see
https://github.com/appropriate/docker-postgis)
However, it looks like in the process of updating the repo, version 2.1 of
the "postgis" package was removed. This means that I can no longer build an
image for PostGIS 2.1 on older Postgres versions that includes the PostGIS
userland binaries.
I understand the difficulty of providing both a 2.2 package and a 2.1
package in the same repo since there is no version number in the package
name (e.g. "postgis-2.1" and "postgis-2.2"), so I'm wondering how much of a
loss it is to no longer have the userland binaries. I personally don't use
those binaries, so I can't be sure of the impact of simply removing them
from the Docker image.
-md
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2016-01-25 09:09:07 | Re: Missing userland binaries for PostGIS 2.1 |
| Previous Message | apt.postgresql.org repository | 2016-01-23 10:48:04 | postgresql-mysql-fdw updated to version 2.1.2-1.pgdg+1 |