From: | Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Joysn <joysn71(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Very slow query performance when using CTE |
Date: | 2025-04-03 09:10:07 |
Message-ID: | CAFwT4nBzs=iLHg5Q75rA=6AtA=AqqutOS051XzBw3XFt90d1_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>
> CREATE STATISTICS st_simrun_component_metadata (dependencies) ON
> sim_run_id, key FROM sim_run_component_metadata;
> ANALYZE sim_run_component_metadata;
>
> When I run this query, no statistics are returned:
>
> SELECT m.* FROM pg_statistic_ext join pg_statistic_ext_data on (oid =
> stxoid),
>
> pg_mcv_list_items(stxdmcv) m WHERE stxname =
> 'st_simrun_component_metadata';
>
> Is there something I might have missed?
>
It looks like you created "dependencies" statistics, but then searched for
"mcv" statistics. To test if mcv helps, you could drop and recreate as:
CREATE STATISTICS st_simrun_component_metadata (mcv) ...
The fetch from the table is rather fast. some milliseconds. But a
> subsequent sort operations takes very long time, for the amount of records
> fetched.
>
This does not seem to be the case for the slow cases you shared (those are
dominated by several millisecond index scans that are looped over 32k
times). So I assume you're talking about the fast case? If so, there is a
Sort that takes a couple of hundred milliseconds being done on disk (~15MB)
so you might also want to look into how fast that would be in memory (via
work_mem).
> But, just like the estimated rows in the plan, it does not match the real
> amount of available data in the table:
>
I'm not sure what you mean by this, is it only that the row estimates are
still bad?
Regards,
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Pang | 2025-04-03 12:38:49 | Re: partition table optimizer join cost misestimation |
Previous Message | Chris Joysn | 2025-04-03 07:21:25 | Fwd: Very slow query performance when using CTE |