From: | Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Foreign key against a partitioned table |
Date: | 2016-08-23 20:00:22 |
Message-ID: | CAFwQ8re__=xcYRzmD+CofHWoUiLZcGU0cWuRejt6Tg3knsGjdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
How do you create a foreign key that references a partitioned table?
I'm splitting a large table "molecules" into 20 partitions, which also has
an associated "molecular_properties" table. It looks something like this
(pseudo-code):
create table molecules(molecule_id integer primary key,
molecule_data text,
p integer);
foreach $p (0..19) {
create table molecules_$p (check(p = $p)) inherits (molecules);
}
create table molecular_properties(molprops_id integer primary key,
molecule_id integer,
molecular_weight numeric(8,3));
alter table molecular_properties
add constraint fk_molecular_properties
foreign key(molecule_id)
references molecules(molecule_id);
(NB: There is no natural way to partition molecules, so the value for p is
a random number. There is a good reason for partitioning that's not
relevant to my question...)
When I try to insert something into the molecular_properties table it fails:
insert or update on table "molecular_properties" violates foreign key
constraint "fk_molecular_properties"
DETAIL: Key (molecule_id)=(83147) is not present in table "molecules".
This surprised me. Obviously ID isn't in the "molecules" parent table, but
I guessed that the foreign key would work anyway since the parent table is
supposed to behave as though it includes all of the child tables.
So how do you create a foreign key on a partitioned table?
I suppose I could partition the molecular_properties table, but that would
add unnecessary complication to the schema for no reason other than the "on
delete cascade" feature.
The only other thing I can think of is a delete trigger on each of the
partition child tables. That would work, but it's a nuisance.
Thanks,
Craig
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Neyman | 2016-08-23 20:07:30 | Re: Foreign key against a partitioned table |
Previous Message | Igor Neyman | 2016-08-23 19:52:00 | Re: Forward declaration of table |