From: | Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can't get two index scans |
Date: | 2016-06-23 19:52:25 |
Message-ID: | CAFwQ8rdkPHJFNOUjELUjSRViDUFFjLYFAPgBizbrh38fk=UY5g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> ...
> But, JChem's cartridge is apparently not using a GiST index, which is
> what my first guess was. I can't really figure out what PostgreSQL
> API it is tapping into, so whatever it is very well might not support
> multi-column indexes at all.
>
They run a separate chemistry server process, which I believe is a Java
app. My guess (and it's strictly a guess) is that they use classic chemical
bitmap fingerprints, and the index scan runs in their separate process and
only returns the index-scan results.
Craig
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | t.dalpozzo@gmail.com | 2016-06-25 16:19:50 | can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-06-23 15:47:56 | Re: Can't get two index scans |