Re: Can't get two index scans

From: Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can't get two index scans
Date: 2016-06-23 19:52:25
Message-ID: CAFwQ8rdkPHJFNOUjELUjSRViDUFFjLYFAPgBizbrh38fk=UY5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> ...
> But, JChem's cartridge is apparently not using a GiST index, which is
> what my first guess was. I can't really figure out what PostgreSQL
> API it is tapping into, so whatever it is very well might not support
> multi-column indexes at all.
>

They run a separate chemistry server process, which I believe is a Java
app. My guess (and it's strictly a guess) is that they use classic chemical
bitmap fingerprints, and the index scan runs in their separate process and
only returns the index-scan results.

Craig

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message t.dalpozzo@gmail.com 2016-06-25 16:19:50 can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2016-06-23 15:47:56 Re: Can't get two index scans