Re: Does CLUSTER generate WAL data?

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:49 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> I know the CLUSTER command essentially creates a new table, copies the
>> data in INDEX order, then deletes the original table.
>>
>> Does that mean all of the data passes through the WAL logs, or is it
>> purely an internal operation? More specifically, if we're doing streaming
>> replication, will all of the data for the table being clustered be
>> transmitted across the network to the hot-standby slave?
>>
>>
> Not looking at the code but, yes, the replica must be an exact physical
> duplicate of the master and since the only ongoing source of data for the
> replica is the WAL the actions taken as part of performing a CLUSTER must
> be logged.
>

Right, I understand that the WAL has to record the operation. But I'm not
sure that answers the question. If the contents of the WAL are, "copy this
table to that table in index order", then no data from the table itself
will be in the WAL. On the other hand, if the contents of the WAL are
"create a new table, and then insert all of this data", then the WAL
records will be huge.

Which is it?

Thanks,
Craig

> David J.
>
>

--
---------------------------------
Craig A. James
Chief Technology Officer
eMolecules, Inc.
---------------------------------