From: | Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Latest advice on SSD? |
Date: | 2018-04-10 02:36:27 |
Message-ID: | CAFwQ8rcCSiD2jC1JXHEh4fjxjzP+M9gGnbBNHj_+rm=Ng2ea+A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
One of our four "big iron" (spinning disks) servers went belly up today.
(Thanks, Postgres and pgbackrest! Easy recovery.) We're planning to move to
a cloud service at the end of the year, so bad timing on this. We didn't
want to buy any more hardware, but now it looks like we have to.
I followed the discussions about SSD drives when they were first becoming
mainstream; at that time, the Intel devices were king. Can anyone recommend
what's a good SSD configuration these days? I don't think we want to buy a
new server with spinning disks.
We're replacing:
8 core (Intel)
48GB memory
12-drive 7200 RPM 500GB
RAID1 (2 disks, OS and WAL log)
RAID10 (8 disks, postgres data dir)
2 spares
Ubuntu 16.04
Postgres 9.6
The current system peaks at about 7000 TPS from pgbench.
Our system is a mix of non-transactional searching (customers) and
transactional data loading (us).
Thanks!
Craig
--
---------------------------------
Craig A. James
Chief Technology Officer
eMolecules, Inc.
---------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2018-04-10 07:21:53 | Sv: Latest advice on SSD? |
Previous Message | Deepak Somaiya | 2018-04-08 20:14:29 | Re: citext performance |