From: | Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: warm standby - apply wal archives |
Date: | 2011-09-06 08:02:43 |
Message-ID: | CAFrxt0hbnkGV1t9xzpXNqKNhgiMTWOeAqR-rsrq5b9qpkTRtFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Considering the size of WAL archives = 200GB
Compressing them using gzip (you can use this command in a shell script and
place it in archive_command as well) would possibly reduce the size to as
low as 10 - 20 GB.
Please let us know the results.
Thanks
Venkat
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:03 PM, MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The network bandwidth between the servers is definitely not an issue. What
> is
> bothering me is the big size of the wal archives, which goes up to 200GB
> per
> day and if the standby server will be able to replay all these files. The
> argument that; since the master can do it and also do various other tasks
> at
> the same time, and since the secondary is identical to the first, so he
> should be able to do that seems valid, so i will give it a try and let you
> know about the results. In the meantime if there are any other
> ideas/suggestions etc please let me know. thx to all
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/warm-standby-apply-wal-archives-tp4770567p4773498.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MirrorX | 2011-09-06 09:41:33 | Re: warm standby - apply wal archives |
Previous Message | MirrorX | 2011-09-06 07:33:28 | Re: warm standby - apply wal archives |