Cavium ThunderX Processors used for PostgreSQL?

From: Arya F <arya6000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Cavium ThunderX Processors used for PostgreSQL?
Date: 2017-02-25 16:33:34
Message-ID: CAFoK1ay825KUtxAmUzcirbu0geNYo2hFbwUU6LUfPQNP2Qw45g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I was shopping around for a dedicated server and I noticed a plan which
uses 2X Cavium ThunderX processors which gives me a total of 96 cores.

I use PostgreSQL + PgBouncer which accepts many connections at a time. I
have my current one to accept maximum connections of 1000, but it never
goes above 200 active connections but the traffic to the system is always
increasing and I want to have the hardware to handle it.

It's the first time I see the Cavium ThunderX name. How do these compare to
a machine that has 2 × E5-2640 v3? I noticed the Cavium ThunderX is a lot
cheaper, but it's not a known name.

What would I get better results with 2X Cavium ThunderX processors with 96
cores or 2 × E5-2640 v3 with 16 cores?

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2017-02-25 18:03:23 Re: Re: GMT FATAL: remaining connection slots are reserved for non-replication superuser connections, but I'm using pgBouncer for connection pooling
Previous Message lisandro 2017-02-25 15:29:40 Re: GMT FATAL: remaining connection slots are reserved for non-replication superuser connections, but I'm using pgBouncer for connection pooling