| From: | Casey Allen Shobe <casey(at)shobe(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | PGSQL-Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jack Kaufman <jack(dot)kaufman(at)sanmina(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Determine the name of the calling function |
| Date: | 2013-01-18 22:34:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAFmVg3jRNG=VF2TTSnXiVDz86hHYL5XPcPTJd_v4o-x9dipEOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Daniel Staal <DStaal(at)usa(dot)net> wrote:
> Just a question, as I'm not entirely sure of the answer myself, but would
> it be possible in another one of the languages Postgres supports? This
> sounds like a language feature to me, and I know Perl's 'caller' function
> would do this for instance, the question is if it would be fully functional
> in pgPerl.
>
I believe I tried that before and the issue is basically that pl/Perl does
not have any visibility outside of the function. database functions <>
perl functions.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-18 22:38:19 | Re: Determine the name of the calling function |
| Previous Message | Jack Kaufman | 2013-01-18 21:04:43 | Re: Determine the name of the calling function |