From: | Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core? |
Date: | 2014-09-18 17:17:17 |
Message-ID: | CAFjNrYuU2z+uQ0KTTGzX7+5-PU_oYZjOPAtRkzOMCUX3j5Zkjw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 18 September 2014 18:54, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/18/2014 9:07 AM, cowwoc wrote:
>
>> You are confusing a private JRE installation with the public JRE
>> installation (yes, there is such a thing). The public JRE is found in
>> java/jre8. The private JRE is found in java/jdk1.8.0_20/jre.
>>
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/jdk-8-readme-2095712.html#
>> redistribution gives you permission to redistribute the JRE directory
>> that ships inside each JDK installation. If you dig into jre/bin/server you
>> will find jvm.dll.
>>
>
> ah, that I see... C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\server\jvm.dll
>
> for some reason I was thinking it needed {lib}jni.{so,dll}
>
>
Does it mean that there should be distributed many jvm.dlls for each of the
jvm versions?
Szymon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dev Kumkar | 2014-09-18 17:22:57 | Re: [GENERAL] [SQL] pg_multixact issues |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2014-09-18 16:54:19 | Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core? |