Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-03-06 08:29:01
Message-ID: CAFjFpRfyz4LrBQ6uh2rCNa3KPvDO9S3mMxexUKraeHbuL4zXQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> We can leave it for the committer to decide, maybe. Committers often
> rewrite surrounding comments to improve wording, correcting factual
> errors, etc.
>

Sure.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2017-03-06 08:33:43 Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Previous Message Rushabh Lathia 2017-03-06 08:27:55 Re: wait events for disk I/O