| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2017-01-25 05:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfwJWGjEOtAt2WVsrTWo1gaTF92P+JTvu6vc8qwjDavCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The documentation available at
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html,
does not make it clear that the lower bound of a range partition is
always inclusive and the higher one is exclusive. I think a note in
section " PARTITION OF parent_table FOR VALUES partition_bound_spec"
would be helpful.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/01/25 5:55, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> [ new patches ]
>>
>> Committed 0001 and 0002. See my earlier email for comments on 0003.
>
> It seems patches for all the issues mentioned in this thread so far,
> except 0003 (I just sent an updated version in another email), have been
> committed. Thanks a lot for your time. I will create new threads for any
> more patches from here on.
>
> Regards,
> Amit
>
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-25 05:55:16 | Re: multivariate statistics (v19) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-25 05:53:20 | Re: Pinning a buffer in TupleTableSlot is unnecessary |