From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Comment fixes in create_grouping_paths() add_paths_to_append_rel() |
Date: | 2018-03-15 04:26:15 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfhk9yF+MHrm=JrjMFqbWPSrBXNHKJEw-QyijG0wXYuow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Greetings Ashutosh,
>
> * Ashutosh Bapat (ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com) wrote:
>> Here are two patches fixing comments.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> 0001
>> A comment in add_paths_to_append_rel() mentions the number of paths
>> instead of number of workers by mistake. Fixed it.
>
> This looks alright.
>
>> 0002
>> Commit b5635948ab165b6070e7d05d111f966e07570d81 added a single
>> grouping_sets_data argument instead of two lists related to grouping
>> sets to create_grouping_paths(), but forgot to update the prologue of
>> the function. Fixed it.
>
> This also looks good, but misses a similar mishap from that commit, in
> the function header of get_number_of_groups().
>
Thanks. The changes look good.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-03-15 04:27:40 | Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-03-15 03:32:39 | Re: Incorrect comment for ExecProcessReturning |