| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken |
| Date: | 2018-06-19 10:56:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfbQJnf=i69uK5horeVyh+2ZyOf=u7+tOo9hXcq09OKzg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that this was implied in the precious
> phrasing but you guys visibly don't match with my impression. So I
> would suggest this paragraph at the end:
> "Mixing temporary and permanent relations in the same partition tree is
> not allowed. Hence, if the partitioned table is permanent, so must be
> its partitions at all levels and likewise if the partitioned table is
You don't need to mention "at all levels", its implied recursively.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-06-19 11:03:27 | Re: WAL prefetch |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-19 10:52:41 | Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken |