| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Aggregates push-down to partitions |
| Date: | 2017-11-10 09:15:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfP79taFrfNNAkortMOdnfgC0CXnEYLXN1A30r9y1Bc=w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Konstantin!
>> I wonder if somebody already investigate this problem or working in this
>> direction.
>> May be there are already some patches proposed?
>> I have searched hackers archive, but didn't find something relevant...
>> Are there any suggestions about the best approach to implement this
>> feature?
>>
>
> Maybe in this thread[1] your described problem are solved through
> introducing Parallel Append node?
>
> 1.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ3gD9dy0K_E8r727heqXoBmWZ83HwLFwdcaSSmBQ1%2BS%2BvRuUQ%40mail.gmail.com
You may want to review [2] and [3] as well.
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9666.1491295317@localhost
[3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM2+6=V64_xhstVHie0Rz=KPEQnLJMZt_e314P0jaT_oJ9MR8A@mail.gmail.com
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-11-10 09:24:30 | Re: pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution |
| Previous Message | Amit Khandekar | 2017-11-10 07:49:23 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |