From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Swiech <martin(dot)swiech(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 10 problem with UNION ALL of null value in "subselect" |
Date: | 2018-04-16 13:09:24 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRf6Q0B9m2qqsQjw9vTyh8r2S=FG2SUb360Mg3CbxQ1ciA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Martin Swiech <martin(dot)swiech(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I got some complex query which works on PostgreSQL 9.6 , but fails on
> PostgreSQL 10.
>
> Version of PostgreSQL:
> PostgreSQL 10.3 on x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0, compiled by Apple LLVM version
> 7.0.0 (clang-700.1.76), 64-bit
>
> Simplified core of the problematic query looks like this:
> ```
> select * from (
> select 1::integer as a
> ) t1
> union all
> select * from (
> select null as a
> ) t2;
> ```
>
> It fails with this error message:
> ```
> ERROR: UNION types integer and text cannot be matched
> LINE 5: select * from (
> ^
> SQL state: 42804
> Character: 66
> ```
>
The error disappears if we go one commit before
1e7c4bb0049732ece651d993d03bb6772e5d281a, the error disappears. But
that's I think expected with that commit.
We can work around this problem by casting null to integer like null::integer.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-04-16 13:20:03 | Re: very slow queries when max_parallel_workers_per_gather is higher than zero |
Previous Message | Ildus Kurbangaliev | 2018-04-16 12:50:36 | Re: Prefix operator for text and spgist support |