Re: foreign partition DDL regression tests

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: foreign partition DDL regression tests
Date: 2017-03-09 06:23:17
Message-ID: CAFjFpRf0xf9KMHuCyFCoBACJmx7-H=F4=-m1b0QshtsmKvbTjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>> I didn't do anything about Ashutosh's comment that we could use ALTER
>> FOREIGN TABLE rather than ALTER TABLE someplace; that didn't seem
>> critical.
>
> Attached is a patch to fix that, just in case.

Thanks. Looks good to me.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Wagner 2017-03-09 06:48:52 Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-09 06:19:21 Re: foreign partition DDL regression tests