Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> >> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > The previous patch would not compile on the latest HEAD. Here's
> updated
> >> > patch.
> >>
> >> Perhaps unsurprisingly, this doesn't apply any more. But we have
> >> bigger things to worry about.
> >>
> >
> > Here's updated patch. I didn't use version numbers in file names in my
> > previous patches. I am starting from this onwards.
>
> Ashutosh, others, this thread has been stalling for more than 1 month
> and a half. There is a new patch that still applies (be careful of
> whitespaces btw), but no reviews came in. So what should we do? I
> would tend to move this patch to the next CF because of a lack of
> reviews.
>

Yes, that would help. Thanks.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company