Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause
Date: 2018-07-10 13:54:44
Message-ID: CAFjFpRdiwDj+z5PQ6prqptn2AzzAisk0OunkmVMY2kA1U3N+Tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Alexander Kuzmenkov
<a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 04:12 PM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I will continue reviewing the patches.
>>>
>> Here are some more review comments
>
>
>
> Ashutosh,
>
> Many thanks for the review, I'm glad that we are continuing with this patch.
> I'm working on your comments now, will post the updated version this week.

While updating the patches, please consider adding some comments as to
why only single inequality clause supported. I didn't see comments in
the patch explaining that.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-10 13:54:55 Re: [PG-11] Potential bug related to INCLUDE clause of CREATE INDEX
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-10 13:51:27 Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing