Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-05-16 07:19:30
Message-ID: CAFjFpRdf_BAoCW1a3Ba5cXZGnXhuZq=W7qPEan6mWPYSmySapQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:03 AM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Collation is only relevant for ordering, not equality.

While earlier, I thought the same, I am wondering whether this is
true. Don't different collations deem different strings equal e.g one
collation may deem 'aa' and 'AA' as same but other may not. Or is that
encoding problem being discussed in hash functions thread?

Sorry for the confusion.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2017-05-16 07:28:25 Re: Event triggers + table partitioning cause server crash in current master
Previous Message Vaishnavi Prabakaran 2017-05-16 06:29:40 Re: COPY FROM STDIN behaviour on end-of-file