| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
| Date: | 2015-11-09 11:01:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRd7ddjL+8VnTju6Ybj17LeibF_pXsfmY-u-LzkXf47DeQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Any distributed transaction management requires 2PC in some or other form.
> So, we should implement 2PC for FDW keeping in mind various forms of 2PC
> used practically. Use that infrastructure to build XTM like capabilities
> for restricted postgres_fdw uses. Previously, I have requested the authors
> of XTM to look at my patch and provide me feedback about their requirements
> for implementing 2PC part of XTM. But I have not heard anything from them.
>
> 1.
> https://domino.mpi-inf.mpg.de/intranet/ag5/ag5publ.nsf/1c0a12a383dd2cd8c125613300585c64/7684dd8109a5b3d5c1256de40051686f/$FILE/tdd99.pdf
>
>
>
> Sorry, may be I missed some message. but I have not received request from
> you to provide feedback concerning your patch.
>
>
See my mail on 31st August on hackers in the thread with subject
"Horizontal scalability/sharding".
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company
>
>
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-11-09 11:36:53 | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-11-09 10:42:06 | Re: Erroneous cost estimation for nested loop join |