Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Date: 2018-06-01 15:15:33
Message-ID: CAFjFpRcw8F=c3424Tp4pe072uPh8607v5eG+dbvrYa4SsV5-pA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data;
> ┌─────────┐
> │ count │
> ╞═════════╡
> │ 1000000 │
> └─────────┘
> (1 row)
>
> \dt+ can display actual size of partitioned table data - now zero is
> displayed
>
> postgres=# \dt+ data
> List of relations
> ┌────────┬──────┬───────┬───────┬─────────┬─────────────┐
> │ Schema │ Name │ Type │ Owner │ Size │ Description │
> ╞════════╪══════╪═══════╪═══════╪═════════╪═════════════╡
> │ public │ data │ table │ pavel │ 0 bytes │ │
> └────────┴──────┴───────┴───────┴─────────┴─────────────┘
> (1 row)

I think we should at least display "Type" as "partitioned table" for a
partitioned table, so that it's easy to understand why the size is 0;
partitioned tables do not hold any data by themselves.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-06-01 15:21:52 Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Previous Message Steven Winfield 2018-06-01 15:12:02 RE: FW: Possible optimisation: push down SORT and LIMIT nodes