From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: expand_dbname in postgres_fdw |
Date: | 2017-07-26 09:38:12 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRcqAXcy6s44N9RhE0ORtYBJawPTDuhQV86UG5ONNUE=pA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any particular reason why postgres_fdw forbids usage of
> connection strings by passing expand_dbname = false to
> PQconnectdbParams? Attached patch shows where this happens.
>
According to F.34.1.1 at [1] passing connection string as dbname
option should work, so your question is valid. I am not aware of any
discussion around this on hackers. Comments in connect_pg_server()
don't help either. But I guess, we expect users to set up individual
foreign server and user mapping options instead of putting those in a
connection string. I can not think of any reason except that it
improves readability. If postgres_fdw wants to take certain actions
based on the values of individual options, having them separate is
easier to handle than parsing them out of a connection string.
Any way, if we are not going to change current behaviour, we should
change the documentation and say that option dbname means "database
name" and not a connection string.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/postgres-fdw.html#idm44880567492496
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tushar | 2017-07-26 10:09:51 | pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" in child table must be marked NOT NULL |
Previous Message | Rafia Sabih | 2017-07-26 09:34:46 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |