From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replacing lfirst() with lfirst_node() appropriately in planner.c |
Date: | 2017-09-06 05:19:21 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRc_zdcTPm40qYgNeAtv_LFrgw9R7s6Y3kVpdHrA3QZUPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Jeevan Chalke
>> <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Attached patch for replacing linitial() with linital_node() appropriately in
>>> planner.c
>
>> Ok. The patch looks good to me. It compiles and make check passes.
>> Here are both the patches rebased on the latest sources.
>
> LGTM, pushed. I also changed a couple of places that left off any cast
> of lfirst, eg:
>
> - List *gset = lfirst(lc);
> + List *gset = (List *) lfirst(lc);
>
> While this isn't really harmful, it's not per prevailing style.
+1. Thanks.
>
> BTW, I think we *could* use "lfirst_node(List, ...)" in cases where
> we know the list is supposed to be a list of objects rather than ints
> or Oids. I didn't do anything about that observation, though.
>
IMO, it won't be apparent as to why some code uses lfirst_node(List,
...) and some code uses (List *) lfirst().
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Catalin Iacob | 2017-09-06 05:27:14 | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-09-06 05:13:58 | Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter |