| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE |
| Date: | 2017-09-04 08:02:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRcVa2LFo+tZMXZggOYYvBwtdWDFzc10gsCd2Tk82pYMCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> On 2017/09/04 13:51, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thomas's application to track patches told me that this patch needs
>> rebase. It also required some changes to the code. Here's the updated
>> version. I have squashed those two patches together.
>
> Thanks for the rebased patch.
>
> Would it make sense to post them in a new thread? When this message
> popped into my inbox in a thread titled "dropping partitioned tables
> without CASCADE", I wondered for a second if there is still something left
> to be done about that. :)
That would be good. We will have to update the thread in commitfest
entry though.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-04 08:17:19 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-04 07:04:34 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |