From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
Cc: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize |
Date: | 2024-08-25 18:57:30 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDtW94U2inD3tXiF++JvL3gzYrCfqZh4hHTHovkES+Ezg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
so 24. 8. 2024 v 7:40 odesílatel Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
napsal:
>
> On 19.06.24 10:59, Jim Jones wrote:
> > On 09.02.24 14:19, Jim Jones wrote:
> >> v9 attached with rebase due to changes done to primnodes.h in 615f5f6
> >>
> > v10 attached with rebase due to changes in primnodes, parsenodes.h, and
> > gram.y
> >
> v11 attached with rebase due to changes in xml.c
>
I try to check this patch
There is unwanted white space in the patch
-<-><--><-->xmlFreeDoc(doc);
+<->else if (format == XMLSERIALIZE_CANONICAL || format ==
XMLSERIALIZE_CANONICAL_WITH_NO_COMMENTS)
+ <>{
+<-><-->xmlChar *xmlbuf = NULL;
+<-><-->int nbytes;
+<-><-->int
1. the xml is serialized to UTF8 string every time, but when target type is
varchar or text, then it should be every time encoded to database encoding.
Is not possible to hold utf8 string in latin2 database varchar.
2. The proposed feature can increase some confusion in implementation of NO
IDENT. I am not an expert on this area, so I checked other databases. DB2
does not have anything similar. But Oracle's "NO IDENT" clause is very
similar to the proposed "CANONICAL". Unfortunately, there is different
behaviour of NO IDENT - Oracle's really removes formatting, Postgres does
nothing.
Regards
Pavel
> --
> Jim
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-08-25 19:00:00 | Re: type cache cleanup improvements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-08-25 17:28:13 | Re: Non-trivial condition is only propagated to one side of JOIN |