Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control

Hi

st 25. 1. 2023 v 15:39 odesílatel songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> napsal:

> Hello, this is the target I refer to. At present, our patch supports this
> usage, so I later thought of developing this patch.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> songjinzhou(2903807914(at)qq(dot)com)
>
>
> *From:* Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> *Date:* 2023-01-25 22:21
> *To:* songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
> *CC:* pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control
> Hi
>
>
ok, I was wrong, PL/SQL supports this syntax. But what is the real use
case? This is an example from the book.

Regards

Pavel

> st 25. 1. 2023 v 15:18 odesílatel songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> napsal:
>
>> Hello, this usage scenario is from Oracle's PL/SQL language (I have been
>> doing the function development of PL/SQL language for some time). I think
>> this patch is very practical and will expand our for loop scenario. In
>> short, I look forward to your
>>
>
> I don't see any real usage. PL/SQL doesn't support proposed syntax.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
>> reply.
>>
>> Happy Chinese New Year!
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> songjinzhou(2903807914(at)qq(dot)com)
>>
>>
>> Maybe you didn't understand my reply. Without some significant real use
>> case, I am strongly against the proposed feature and merging your patch to
>> upstream. I don't see any reason to enhance language with this feature.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>