| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: ignore null fields in not relation type composite type based constructors |
| Date: | 2014-09-11 06:45:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDpr7KwfuPsW4FJ80URpSQ3Zcquija+83KWhXFu1RoxFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Stephen
Can I help with something, it is there some open question?
Regards
Pavel
2014-09-08 6:27 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > ignore_nulls in array_to_json_pretty probably is not necessary. On second
> > hand, the cost is zero, and we can have it for API consistency.
>
> I'm willing to be persuaded either way on this, really. I do think it
> would be nice for both array_to_json and row_to_json to be single
> functions which take default values, but as for if array_to_json has a
> ignore_nulls option, I'm on the fence and would defer to people who use
> that function regularly (I don't today).
>
> Beyond that, I'm pretty happy moving forward with this patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2014-09-11 06:47:46 | Re: add modulo (%) operator to pgbench |
| Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2014-09-11 05:46:21 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |