From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | belal <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Copy command Faster than original select |
Date: | 2015-02-06 08:38:20 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDkenXG8-cAMuGNgyjoR9Ne+RRA5xdz1DWiuLqWDdKX7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi
2015-02-06 9:30 GMT+01:00 belal <belalhamed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I made complex select using PGAdmin III Query Editor, Postgre server 9.3
>
>
> select ... from mytable join .. join ... order by ....
>
> I get [Total query runtime: 8841 ms. 43602 rows retrieved.]
>
> but when I use
>
> copy ([same above select]) to '/x.txt'
> I get [Query returned successfully: 43602 rows affected, 683 ms execution
> time.]
>
> these test made on the same machine as the postgresql server.
>
>
> can anyone explain huge difference in executing time?
>
probably terrible uneffective execution plan
can you send a explain analyze of your slow query?
Regards
Pavel
>
> best regards all
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Copy-command-Faster-than-original-select-tp5836886.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Belal Al-Hamed | 2015-02-06 08:44:29 | Re: Copy command Faster than original select |
Previous Message | belal | 2015-02-06 08:30:39 | Copy command Faster than original select |