| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-10-09 06:43:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDi1n2_TYmuSXM=M6xgobz_BnWOMwrdc9zmho=9fa_5qA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
2016-10-08 23:46 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:
> On 10/3/16 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> I am feeling consensus on removing source of PL from \dt+. There is
>> partial consensus on saving this field (renamed) for C and internal
>> language. I am not sure about consensus about \sf enhancing.
>>
>
> FWIW, I'm completely in favor of ditching PL source code. I'm neutral on C
> and internal.
>
here is a patch
Regards
Pavel
> --
> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
> Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
> 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| psql-clean-df.patch | text/x-patch | 734 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2016-10-09 09:18:03 | Re: Switch to unnamed POSIX semaphores as our preferred sema code? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-10-09 06:01:03 | Re: vacuumdb -f and -j options (was Question / requests.) |