Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl
Date: 2017-03-11 10:59:00
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDh2bX4nDb+xzfULwq0086vs=1U0LRjGMEsgNmqNANyzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-03-10 20:31 GMT+01:00 Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:04:31 +0100
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > > Now test demonstrate how errors uncaught on the Tcl level interact
> > > with postgresql error system.
> > >
> >
> > you can catch the exception outside and write own message
>
> OK, here is patch with tests which don't depend on function OIDs
>
> They ignore stack trace ($::errorinfo global variable) completely,
> and analyze just error message.
>
>
all tests passed

I have not any other objections

I'll mark this patch as ready for commiter

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-03-11 12:06:13 Re: Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed
Previous Message Nikhil Sontakke 2017-03-11 10:26:25 Re: Speedup twophase transactions