| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hugo Mercier <hugo(dot)mercier(at)oslandia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Detection of nested function calls |
| Date: | 2013-10-28 10:29:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDcT-W1OzTVwDma6jrY1Dr5xfN=eyqRen387S1sWpbmiw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/10/28 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> On 2013-10-28 10:12:41 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > I think we'd need another argument to CREATE FUNCTION like SERIALIZE
> > > pointing to a function that that has to return data that can be stored
> > > on disk. Deserialization would be up to individual functions.
> > >
> > > Depending on the specification this might turn out to be slightly
> > > invasive, tuplestore/sort et al probably have to care...
>
> > Then you need a functions than prepare a clone of unpacked data too.
>
> Why? In those case we can (and should) just store the ondisk
> representation.
>
ok,
Pavel
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> PS: Could you please try to trim the quoted emails a bit?
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2013-10-28 11:46:41 | Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" |
| Previous Message | Stéphan BEUZE | 2013-10-28 09:52:55 | Re: ERROR : 'tuple concurrently updated' |