From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Remi Colinet <remi(dot)colinet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3] pg_progress() SQL function to monitor progression of long running SQL queries/utilities |
Date: | 2017-07-26 14:24:15 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDVH7WbHhwZKi3SmLhF+3LPfhbNf6cr5Lh0t6W-9WbwMQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-07-26 15:27 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Remi Colinet <remi(dot)colinet(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > test=# SELECT pid, ppid, bid, concat(repeat(' ', 3 * indent),name),
> value,
> > unit FROM pg_progress(0,0);
> > pid | ppid | bid | concat | value | unit
> > -------+------+-----+------------------+------------------+---------
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | status | query running |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | relationship | progression |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | node name | Sort |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | sort status | on tapes writing |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | completion | 0 | percent
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | relationship | Outer |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | node name | Seq Scan |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | scan on | t_10m |
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | fetched | 25049 | block
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | total | 83334 | block
> > 14106 | 0 | 4 | completion | 30 | percent
> > (11 rows)
> >
> > test=#
>
> Somehow I imagined that the output would look more like what EXPLAIN
> produces.
>
me too.
Regards
Pavel
>
> > If the one shared memory page is not enough for the whole progress
> report,
> > the progress report transfert between the 2 backends is done with a
> series
> > of request/response. Before setting the latch, the monitored backend
> write
> > the size of the data dumped in shared memory and set a status to indicate
> > that more data is to be sent through the shared memory page. The
> monitoring
> > backends get the result and sends an other signal, and then wait for the
> > latch again. The monitored backend does not collect a new progress report
> > but continues to dump the already collected report. And the exchange
> goes on
> > until the full progress report has been dumped.
>
> This is basically what shm_mq does. We probably don't want to
> reinvent that code, as it has taken a surprising amount of debugging
> to get it fully working.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-07-26 14:26:14 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Previous Message | Pavel Golub | 2017-07-26 14:13:02 | AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y |