From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Date: | 2013-09-23 09:10:28 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDQsYE7cpdon=+uTZ=VSOkbOLFdnbmkR80ohMHT4Xfdbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/9/23 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> On 2013-09-23 11:00:50 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> > On 9/23/13 10:50 AM, I wrote:
> > >On 9/23/13 6:40 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >>After days I am thinking so it can be a good solution
> > >>
> > >>syntax - enhanced current RAISE
> > >>
> > >>RAISE ASSERT WHEN boolean expression
> > >>
> > >>RAISE ASSERT 'some message' WHEN expression
> > >
> > >It looks like I'm losing this battle, but this syntax isn't too bad.
> > >
> > >>and we can have a GUC that controls asserts per database - possibly
> > >>overwritten by plpgsql option - similar to current plpgsql options
> > >>
> > >>assert_level = [*ignore*, notice, warning, error]
> > >
> > >This sounds like a decent enhancement.
> >
> > Oh, it would be nice to have the option here to say "assertions can't be
> > caught by exception handlers", but I don't know how that mechanism works
> so
> > I'm not sure it's possible. I'll have to look into that.
>
> RAISE ASSERT ... assert_level = PANIC :P.
>
:) maybe some little bit less than PANIC
Pavel
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-09-23 09:12:37 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-09-23 09:07:46 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |