From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Demitri Muna <thatsanicehatyouhave(at)mac(dot)com> |
Cc: | Adam Cornett <adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Explicitly adding a table to a schema. |
Date: | 2011-11-04 18:39:56 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDQeeLoKdYtwF3mqws9q_Rjjf9Ko95ss=kutWo762-2XA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2011/11/4 Demitri Muna <thatsanicehatyouhave(at)mac(dot)com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Adam Cornett wrote:
>
>> You can use ALTER TABLE (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-altertable.html) to set the schema of existing tables:
>> ALTER TABLE foo SET SCHEMA bar
>
> Thanks. I did try that, but that command moves the table to a different schema, which is not what I'm trying to do. It struck me to try to move it to another schema (where the definition then explicitly included the schema prefix) and then move it back, but it still doesn't have the schema prefix.
what you want?
any table is in one schema - you can do some like simlink via view -
and you can set a search_patch - a list of schemas that are acesable
by default
Regards
Pavel
>
> Cheers,
> Demitri
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-11-04 18:43:32 | Re: Explicitly adding a table to a schema. |
Previous Message | Adam Cornett | 2011-11-04 18:37:40 | Re: Explicitly adding a table to a schema. |