| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new gcc warning |
| Date: | 2016-09-01 16:52:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDPMG5OEDS0NSZmdbTuWnX2Z9Z_AtaZp+CcwL1pVqVqmw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-09-01 18:40 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2016-09-01 14:31 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> >> That should have gone away in commit a2fd62dd5. What version are
> >> you looking at?
>
> > I am checking 9.5 branch and I cannot to find this commit there
>
> Hmm ... it wasn't back-patched, evidently. We don't have a clear
> project policy on whether to back-patch changes that are only meant
> to silence useless warnings, but it seems reasonable to push this
> one, since gcc 6 is getting more widespread.
>
Thank you
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-01 17:01:35 | Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-01 16:44:47 | Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers |