| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT |
| Date: | 2012-12-21 15:57:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDJEE0P9Wz0BUcvt8OrLYJpyuZ+4GtB0z5eBGLeaAA3Fw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/12/21 Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>:
> On 12/21/12 4:49 PM, I wrote:
>>
>> On 12/21/12 4:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the use-case for this?
>>
>>
>> Currently, the way to do this would be something like:
>
>
> I realize I didn't really answer the question.
>
> The use case is when you're UPDATEing or DELETEing a row and you want to
> quickly assert that there should be exactly one row. For example, if you've
> previously locked a row with SELECT .. FOR UPDATE, and now you want to
> UPDATE or DELETE it, it better be there (or you have a bug somewhere).
>
yes, it has sense
probably only after keyword it should be simple implementable
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> Regards,
> Marko Tiikkaja
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2012-12-21 16:05:10 | pgcrypto seeding problem when ssl=on |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2012-12-21 15:54:07 | Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT |