Re: The case for version number inflation

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Date: 2013-03-02 05:21:26
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDFk6AahOtwx+nGVEgZEwQLkRupQrSRnxhgK6k9Xyu9cg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

2013/3/2 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
> Related to this:
>
> Apparently MariaDB is arbitrarily bumping their next release up to
> version 10 in order to jump "ahead" of Oracle MySQL. It seems not a
> coincidence that they chose a major version number one ahead of Postgres.

After last 10 years has PostgreSQL significantly better reputation
than MySQL or MariaDB - minimally in Czech Republic and higher release
number in MariaDB change nothing if we stay in our quality and we will
enhance performance.

I have list of committed patches and I don't see any patch that have a
weight for jump to version 10. Almost all new features will not be
fully complete in 9.3 - and it will be done in 9.4.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> http://pgexperts.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2013-03-02 06:01:07 Re: The case for version number inflation
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-03-02 01:16:18 Re: The case for version number inflation