From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The case for version number inflation |
Date: | 2013-03-02 05:21:26 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDFk6AahOtwx+nGVEgZEwQLkRupQrSRnxhgK6k9Xyu9cg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
2013/3/2 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
> Related to this:
>
> Apparently MariaDB is arbitrarily bumping their next release up to
> version 10 in order to jump "ahead" of Oracle MySQL. It seems not a
> coincidence that they chose a major version number one ahead of Postgres.
After last 10 years has PostgreSQL significantly better reputation
than MySQL or MariaDB - minimally in Czech Republic and higher release
number in MariaDB change nothing if we stay in our quality and we will
enhance performance.
I have list of committed patches and I don't see any patch that have a
weight for jump to version 10. Almost all new features will not be
fully complete in 9.3 - and it will be done in 9.4.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> http://pgexperts.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-03-02 06:01:07 | Re: The case for version number inflation |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-03-02 01:16:18 | Re: The case for version number inflation |