Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Date: 2024-07-24 15:52:49
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDDTmEEgt4TKaQ9HSRmwxjF+RHuHnBsM6kVBX3zRmqhGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

po 8. 7. 2024 v 14:36 odesílatel Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
napsal:

> On 7/8/24 04:14, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> > Given the above and the fact that the patch is a breaking change, my
> > vote would still be to keep the current behavior and update the
> > documentation. Though I'd be happy to be overruled by someone with more
> > knowledge of triggers.
>
> Thanks for that feedback.
> Based on that, the patch should be rejected.
>
> Since there were a couple of other opinions early in the thread, I'll let
> it sit like that for now, and judgement can be passed at the end of the
> commitfest. Perhaps somebody else wants to chime in.
>

It is hard to say what should be expected behaviour in this case. I think
the best is just to document this issue, and change nothing.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kuznetsov 2024-07-24 15:53:53 Re: Detect buffer underflow in get_th()
Previous Message Dave Page 2024-07-24 15:49:28 Re: tests fail on windows with default git settings