From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors |
Date: | 2025-02-08 19:56:28 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDCHwKnj=mZXAQLMcTAXkGTO9M5zzGzWB1KGEf4dTn9JA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
so 8. 2. 2025 v 20:25 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I propose to enhancing to ANSI/SQL standard syntax for named arguments
> > `argname => value`
>
> Is there any reason to think that that's actually in the standard?
> I poked around in SQL:2021 a little and couldn't find anything about
> cursors with arguments at all.
>
I think the possibility to use named arguments in OPEN statements is a
PostgreSQL proprietary feature.
And usage of cursors in PL/pgSQL is based on PL/SQL (not on SQL/PSM from
standard), but named
arguments for cursor is PostgreSQL proprietary feature and the syntax based
on usage `:=` is our
proprietary too.
This is from patch
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/4adead1d224278ff3064636063a818eba17cb211
It is from the window, when the named arguments was supported already
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20091008023926.1BE85753FB7@cvs.postgresql.org
(the syntax was changed before release)
but not with ANSI syntax
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/865f14a2d31af23a05bbf2df04c274629c5d5c4d
I forgot to fix this in my patch for 9.5 - probably I missed this
functionality
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-02-08 20:23:39 | Re: Final result (display) collation? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-08 19:25:58 | Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors |