From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
Date: | 2015-03-22 10:57:42 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD=QhC36bMDA3xqRpKR3U7Y4QhYyF_KJn6RwGz3nTuNOQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-03-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On 22 March 2015 at 06:11, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > here is updated patch with array_position, array_positions
> implementation.
> >
> > It is based on committed code - so please, revert commit
> > 13dbc7a824b3f905904cab51840d37f31a07a9ef and apply this patch
> >
>
> I checked this and the changes look good, except that you missed a
> couple of places in src/include/utils/array.h that need updating.
>
> In the public docs, you should s/position/subscript because that's the
> term used throughout the docs for an index into an array. I still like
> the name array_position() for the function though, because it's
> consistent with the existing position() functions.
>
updated patch
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array_position-20150322-2.patch | text/x-patch | 21.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-22 11:06:17 | Re: printing table in asciidoc with psql |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-03-22 10:47:59 | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |